tags 395252 etch-ignore thanks On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 11:58:10AM +0100, A Mennucc wrote: > Steve Langasek ha scritto: > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 09:24:05AM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
> >> Just for the record: the release team had already expressed his view > >> (in a sense): in Oct, there was already a (informal) discussion in > >> #d-release, and the opinion was that this bug 295252 was not RC at all. > > However, the release team is also almost certainly going to defer to the > > security team's judgement as to whether a given package is supportable in a > > stable release, since it's the security team who ultimately has to do the > > supporting. > > So in that sense, yes, it would be RC if the security team says it's RC. > hi Steve > I think that we are reaching an agreement > Moritz said in > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/12/msg00322.html > that he thinks this bug should be RC, but that an exception should be > made for Etch > If everybody agrees, may someone in release team add a etch-ignore to > that bug? Andi and I are agreed that this is a suitable solution given the evident approval of the security team. I'm tagging bug #395252 etch-ignore with this mail (which means solving this *is* regarded as release critical for lenny), which means that, AFAICS, there is no longer a matter for the TC to rule on so I'm also closing that bug. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
