Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (20/12/2006): > tags 403803 + wontfix > thanks > > On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Thomas Huriaux wrote: > > Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (19/12/2006): > > > On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Thomas Huriaux wrote: > > > > Please use gettext-based debconf templates to allow translations, as > > > > recommended by the developers-reference (section 6.5.2.2). See > > > > po-debconf(7). There is also a lintian warning: > > > > W: pine source: not-using-po-debconf > > > > If you need additional help to do this switch, do not hesitate to ask me > > > > or to ask on debian-i18n. > > > > > > Hmm, what if I consider that pine, being a non-free package, does not > > > deserve the same level of support of the other packages in main? > > > > Does it deserve a lower level than the minimum expected? > > [ Do you like word games? ] > > Some people think non-free does not deserve any support at all. > > I support pine only partially, so I have added debconf stuff to > allow for unattented installs, but that's all.
Do you allow me or any other people caring about i18n to do the job for you, either by NMUing the package or by providing full patches? Or should we just stay away from that package? -- Thomas Huriaux
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
