* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > This is a followup for bug: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=272258 > > I understand that having the explanation for why the debian > firefox logo is not the same as upstream may avaoid the bug to be > resend. I also disagree with this practice. > This is not a bug and could be closed , it won't empty the big > bug list but don't help with this either. > > > There are mailing list archives, gmane.org, google , irc channels > for newbies to get such information. Some have the habits to fill > bug reports withotu the slightest search before but using the bts > as a knowledge base won't help , it may only end up killing the > bts sooner. > > Well in short i would like this bug to be closed , though you are > the one working on this package.
If I close the bug, someone else will reopen it or file new ones. Better to just leave it alone. -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
