Gerhard Brauer wrote: > This as PM, i won't fill the BTS with "private speech" ;-)
I am replying to the bug, as I don't agree that this is "noise". The BTS is a good tool to keep track of all the info, and lirc is group maintained, so this way the whole group gets your email, not just me :) This way, your chances of getting the issues fixed sooner increase, and we can help you better. > Oh, at moment i see it in state "Waiting for submitter" and read your > last question to Anthony "Is the problem fixed for you?". > That caused an "internal kernel panic" on me ;-) Sorry, I never thought this tag would scare anyone. It's just for me to know at a glance which bugs are answered to and which bugs are "just there forever" without any further input. In this case, the "Waiting for submitter" tag goes away, a confirmed tag should be added, as both of you, reporters of what I believe is the same bug, are both responsive and still experiencing this bug. > I think you're absolutly right with your suggestions in your answer. I > don't know if lirc-modules is a high-frequently used package (i don't > use it) but like maintainers of many other packages: You can see what Popularity Contest (popcon for short) has to say about it here: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?popcon=lirc (in short, lirc and friends are installed 12.757 times). Scary ;) > I feel you do a quite good job. Thank you, we also appreciate your work as in: - testing lirc - doing what we documented you should do, then failing to get a working module - resisting the frustration and the urge to send us the black helipcopters - submitting helful bug reports instead, dealing with overworked maintainers, and - being extremely patient waiting for fixes ;) Thanks, for bearing with us! -- ยท''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution : :' : -- Emma Goldman `. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (unstable) `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com