clone 404919 -1 reassign 404919 kernel-patch-bootsplash retitle 404919 kernel-patch-bootsplash is obsolete and should not be shipped reassign -1 linux-patch-bootsplash retitle -1 linux-patch-bootsplash should replace kernel-patch-bootsplash severity -1 important thanks
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 07:35:10AM +0100, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: > both linux-patch-bootsplash and kernel-patch-bootsplash ship > `/usr/src/kernel-patches/all/apply/bootsplash' but do not conflict or > add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: > dpkg: error processing > /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-patch-bootsplash_2.6.18-1_all.deb (--unpack): > trying to overwrite `/usr/src/kernel-patches/all/apply/bootsplash', which > is also in package kernel-patch-bootsplash > dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) > Errors were encountered while processing: > /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-patch-bootsplash_2.6.18-1_all.deb > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) > i think linux-patch-bootsplash should replace kernel-patch-bootsplash? is > there > any reason for having this package twice with different versions in the > archive? Nope, the linux-patch-bootsplash changelog makes it clear that this package supersedes kernel-patch-bootsplash, and the kernel-patch-bootsplash package in testing is for an older version of the kernel. So kernel-patch-bootsplash should be dropped from the release (and from the archive, AFAICS?), and linux-patch-bootsplash should Replace: kernel-patch-bootsplash. The latter is not release-critical, because kernel-patch-bootsplash wasn't in sarge and won't be in etch (I'm tagging it for immediate removal from testing). Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
