On Sat, 2006-12-23 at 22:20 +0100, Christer Mjellem Strand wrote: > I disagree. Board admins are indeed board admins, but that does not > necessarily imply they're equipped to do anything directly in the > database.
I agree that this is a potential problem, but I think that giving spammers free advertising by default, and thereby encouraging abuse even more, is a more important problem than having to set up an account for the board admin in those cases that the admin does not have that already. If I were to choose between a smtp server that is an open relay by default, or one that isn't but requires an extra configuration step in some cases, I'd definately choose the latter. > As I said, fully understandable. But I hope it can be looked into > again after release. Sure, we will, and I think there's a better solution possible than this one. We'll work on it, but reverting this solution only swaps one problem for the other. Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
