On Mon, 1 Jan 2007, dean gaudet wrote:
> and i can't even reproduce my results... here's the averages of the user
> cpu seconds for 10 runs of "minizip -9o a.zip linux-2.6.19.tar":
>
> baseline -DUNALIGNED_OK
> k8 revF 26.62 26.59
> core2 28.43 28.44
you know, gzip -9 is noticably faster than zlib... and does show
the UNALIGNED_OK benefits i was claiming in the initial bug report.
aren't they roughly the same algorithms? i wonder what optimizations
are in gzip which aren't in zlib.
baseline -DUNALIGNED_OK
k8 revF 24.48 24.08
core2 26.42 24.41
-dean
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
