On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:27:35AM +0100, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote: > I (as the new maintainer of autofs) would like to have the issue settled > before Etch is released... what consequences do you fear could arise from > moving the script? The present situation forces all users of nis&autofs > to manually shuffle their init scripts around, and this is a very common > setup... Moving autofs to start later (i.e. at 20) is probably unwise (as > explained earlier), although this seems to be what most users currently > do as a workaround.
FWIW, the solution I more-or-less decided upon before giving away autofs was to simply figure out a name that was after 19nis and before 20apache. 195autofs should do, for instance, or 20Autofs. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
