"Shaun Jackman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If #404616 is in fact an RC bug, then #405599 should be as well. If > there are no objections, I'll bump the severity of #405599 to serious.
Boost's maintainers have already uploaded a fixed version, and I'm not 100% confident the two bugs are actually related (though I still strongly suspect they are). At this point, I'd probably just wait for new binaries to hit the archive for the two relevant architectures (probably sometime over the weekend) and then request binNMUs. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
