> Each of the other values listed here has an explicit default set in > pam_limits, because RLIM_INFINITY is not a sane default for any of them -- > not for nice and rt priority because these values have a finite scale, not > for core file size because we want core files disabled by default, and not > for stack size because... well, for no reason that I can actually > distinguish from the case of RLIMIT_NOFILES, hmm.
> Thanks, you make a fair case; if we're shadowing the kernel's default for > RLIMIT_STACK already, there's no reason we shouldn't be willing to do the > same for RLIMIT_NOFILES. :) I'll take this upstream for further discussion. Thanks! Dr. Markus Waldeck -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
