On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 09:08:58AM -0700, Khalid Aziz wrote: > Another thing I should point out is, this is a regression from previous > version. My test code which does continuous gzread() on a growing > compressed file worked fine with zlib1g 1.2.1. Would that be enough > reason to mark severity important?
I'd really only see it being justified if it were causing noticable problems for something within Debian. The gzio stuff is a relatively infrequently used part of the zlib APIs and I'd imagine that most of its users don't tend to encounter files that are still being written. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
