Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Uhm sorry. libSM was enough to *build* and get a wine binary that works.
> But to
> get all the features you need one more pack of libraries.
>
> I'm providing a patch for all of them. In addition, we also need libicu36-dev
> but unfortunately the ia32-libs-dev package in which it would belong is only
> available for ia64. I avoided changing this in my patch, assuming you'd want
> to
> decide it yourself.
>
> (the only files we need from libicu36-dev are libsicuuc.a and libsicudata.a)
>
> Thanks!
I was wondering how it comes that you don't need the -dev packages of
all the other libs. Now I wonder even more why you only need the .a of
one library while all others only need the *.so.
The ia32-libs-dev package was removed from amd64 because all its files
got replaced by libc6-dev-i386, lib32z1g-dev, etc. The package was
just empty.
If we now have something substantial to put into ia32-libs-dev I see
no reason not to resurrect it. We do have some *.so symlinks
already. Including the symlinks for *.so files in ia32-libs is
somewhat broken as they lack the Depends on the 64bit -dev packages
they actually need. But they weren't enough incentive to bring back
ia32-libs-dev.
MfG
Goswin
PS: do you have a patch for the wine debian source to build on amd64?
I checked the package and it doesn't have amd64 in debian/controls
yet.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
