On 18/01/07 at 18:56 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 03:12:12PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > > In the initial report you mentioned that sbuild has a problem with > > confusing names like this. Afaik sbuild solely works on source package > > name and version and that is always unique. Where do you get a > > conflict? > > It uses apt-cache to check for available versions, which as you show > gives both results. And sbuild's behaviour depends on the order > apt-cache returns those.
So maybe a solution would be for apt-cache to provide --source-only and --binary-only options, and for sbuild to use --source-only to get the source package and not the binary package... -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
