On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:28:46PM +1100, An?bal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:27:35AM +0100, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote: > >block 341140 by 400952 > >thankyou > > > >Hi Anibal and Javier, > > > >I (as the new maintainer of autofs) would like to have the issue > >settled before Etch is released... what consequences do you fear > >could arise from moving the script? > > That's something we don't know.
So, that's something we don't want to do, certainly not at this stage of the release cycle. > >The present situation forces all users of nis&autofs to manually > >shuffle their init scripts around, and this is a very common > >setup... Moving autofs to start later (i.e. at 20) is probably > >unwise (as explained earlier), although this seems to be what most > >users currently do as a workaround. > > > >Maybe we should talk with the release team to get this in? > > If the release team approves that change we'll change portmap to > start at S17 as already suggested by Javier, see #400952 [0]. What's wrong with Steinar's suggestion to change the name of the autofs script to be something between 19nis and 20apache? Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]