Pierre HABOUZIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > # ctl is in bcc > reassign 149722 bash
Fair enough (building bash with -DAFS is probably a good idea in any case), but I'd still appreciate a response to the last line or so of my original report: >> but I don't see any good reason for ldd to be checking access in the >> first place. To wit, why should ldd *care* whether its argument appears to be readable (or, for that matter, executable, though failing that check merely leads to a warning) at all? Security vaguely comes to mind, but the restriction's too easy to circumvent in normal circumstances for that to carry much weight. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
