On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:55:26AM +0100, Stefano Melchior wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:50:35AM +0000, Brian Brunswick wrote: > Dear Brian, > > Package: user-mode-linux > > Version: 2.6.18-1um-2 > > Severity: normal > > > > > > I wanted to mount a luks partition from inside uml, > > but found that the sha256 kernel module wasn't built in the debian package. > > > > Rebuilding the package with this enabled went fine, so please consider > > it for the standard config. > I was wondering if this submitted bug should be tagged as "wishlist", > instead of "normal": I do not think this is a bug. > I would like to ask to Mattia if it is the case to make a new version > upload for Etch or to leave for Etch+1 > Cheers >
It seems more like an accidental omission rather than deliberate. Most other crypto modules /are/ built. If theres a rational for not building it of course, then wishlist it should be. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
