sorry the end of the last message got accidentally cut off:

If I use the simple mail program nbsmtp to send mail (this is all it
does, just send mail through a smarthost) it sends correctly.  The
headers of a received message look like this (in comparison with above):

=======================================================================
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Tue Feb 13 00:57:49 2007
>From djo  Tue Feb 13 00:57:49 2007
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: GMX delivery to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from pop.gmx.net
        by maxi.alay.net with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.6)
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (single-drop); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:57:49
-0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2007 08:55:27 -0000
Received: by maxi (nbSMTP-1.01-cvs) for uid 1000
        (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256
bits))
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:55:52 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:55:30 -0800
From: Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: test
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
=========================================================================

It looks like the issue is the first From: (the envelope From:?).  In
the failed message through Exim:

MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  (I believe this is the envelope from)
From: Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  message From: which gets ignored

The message through nbsmtp:
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From djo
From: Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  (not sure which From: is which here)

nbsmtp, a much simpler app than Exim, always sends mail correctly
through every mailer when it is provided with the name of the mailer, the
credentials, and the type of auth mechanism to use.  Why is Exim more
complex than this?



Regards,



--
Daniel O'Neill



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to