> Philipp, does su seems to behave correctly when you remove the pam_end
> call in the child?
> My current opinion is that we should remove this pam_end, which would make
> the su behavior consistent with login. (BTW, does login behaves correctly
> regarding pam-krb5?)


Of course, that would be a post-etch change, right?

Even if accepted, I don't feel like changing the behaviour of su right
now...


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to