On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 06:51:27PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > I just want to inform you that there is already a hg-buildpackage in > grml-mercurial-utils (http://hg.grml.org/grml-mercurial-utils/) which I plan > to upload after Linuxday in Chemnitz.
and On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:29:06PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote: > Cool! I'm eager to have a look at your repo. I've been using my own > crappy scripts for a while, but haven't found the time to get them into > releasable shape. They're quite tailored to my current workflow of > hg+mq, keeping all debian-related changes in patches. Clumsy, but > working. If you're interested, you can have a look at > > http://antares.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/%7ekobras/hg/hgwebdir.cgi/hg-buildpackage/ Hi Alexander and Daniel, I seem to have stirred a pot of hg-buildpackage code here. My code is now published online, and was just uploaded before I got to my email... but I am happy to collaborate with you both. It looks like you both have implemehted mq support, which I haven't. On the other hand, I have implemented importing of .dsc files as well as orig.tar.gz files, and work with vanilla Mercurial. That is, I think my code is more oriented towards history management while yours is more oriented towards patch management. Both are useful and there could be room for code sharing. My hg-buildpackage is written entirely with bash, though it is based on my darcs-buildpackage which was written in Haskell. If either of you are interested in contributing to a unified package, let's talk and see what we can do and if our visionsfor this tool can be reconciled. If so, I'd have no problem adding you as uploaders. My code is now online for cloning with: hg clone http://hg.complete.org/hg-buildpackage -- John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]