On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:39:13AM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 06:25:51PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:26:09AM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:02:02PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > > > > > > > > I haven't decided if enabling composite by default is a wise move yet. > > > > No > > > > one in Debian has done a real analysis as to what the downsides of such > > > > a > > > > decision are. > > > > > > > > While compiz and beryl may be very sexy, I don't want to break or > > > > degrade > > > > performance on systems not running them simply for the convenience of > > > > not > > > > having to modify xorg.conf. It's not out of the question, but I don't > > > > want > > > > to blindly enable options in our default settings for the bling of it. > > > > > > Than can we conditionalise it? We could add a question with priority > > > 'normal' that most users won't see. Then in the post-etch era, the Beryl > > > community can add a "reconfigure xserver-xorg and enable beryl settings" > > > step in their how-tos. > > > > > > If we were to do that, I suppose we would prefer to have > > > XAANoOffscreenPixmaps > > > and AddARGBGLXVisuals as well. > > > > I'd be fine with that. You'll have to ask the translation team for > > permission on this one though. I've cc'ed Christian in case he's not > > reading this report. > > Can I assume that, since you agreed to Composite by default in the other > sub-thread, we're only discussing XAANoOffscreenPixmaps and AddARGBGLXVisuals > here ?
Exactly. I don't think composite needs a debconf question. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]