Re: Noah Meyerhans 2007-03-06 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I cannot reproduce the segfaults any longer with either version. Mutt is
> > co-operating on both x86 (with an AthlonXP 1800+) and AMD64 (with a
> > 4600+ X2). Hopefully others have the same experience and this bug can
> > be closed...
> 
> I've been using mutt in etch for several weeks now, and although I
> have some vague recollection of a segfault in that time, I'm not
> completely sure.  The strange thing, though, even with sarge's mutt,
> is that the crashes were really unpredictable.  I could never
> consistently reproduce them.  Mutt would be fine for some time, maybe
> up to one month (not the same process, but getting restarted e.g. when
> I arrived at work each morning).  But then it would go through a
> period where it would crash several times a day for a few days.
> 
> Given that it was so hard to reproduce this problem to begin with, I'm
> hesitant to say that it's gone completely, but it seems like it might
> be.  Sorry I can't provide any more concrete info.

Thanks for the replies. It seems that the behavior at least improved.
I'm going to wait a few days to hear what the others report and then
would like to close the bug - there's a couple of other imap-related
segfaults reported, and given the plethora of recent imap fixes,
chances are high that this is already fixed, or is related to the
others.

Christoph
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to