On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:58:19 +0100, Geert-Jan Hut
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Ok, fair enough. But note that the installation I have is new (I
> have installed it only a week or two ago) and so I assume this file
> is still in it's default state, My original assumption was that the
> package that generates this file during installation would install
> it with content that would not generate a warning like I
> reported. The current file does not use absolute pathnames for the
> update-grub command.
I think the installer creates this file.
> But again thanks for pointing this file out (and reacting on my bug
> report).
There has been a recent bug fix in Sid, where we just let the
default path determine which upgrade-grub is run, and let
upgrade-grub itself generate whatever warnings it needs to. This
might have some affect on the warnings displayed.
manoj
--
We all like praise, but a hike in our pay is the best kind of ways.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
