On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 07:10:32AM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote: > >Nevertheless it's a significant rearchitecting of the package, so I'm not > >sure we'd want to see such a change made at this point of the release > >cycle. > >OTOH, I guess you'll know better than anyone if the resulting package > >works, > >and it would reduce the amount of code we have to carry in the archive... > >It's your call.
> Well, the changes to the debian specific parts are minor: Just add the > build-depend and unpack the tar file from /usr/... instead of the > current directory. Sure; that doesn't mean there couldn't be upstream regressions that aren't RC for our archs, yet break avr. But again, that's for you to judge. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
