* Ryo Furue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-19 15:16]: > Yes, although my dvips is from a different package from yours: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > $ dvips mydoc.dvi -o mydoc.ps > This is dvips(k) p1.7a Copyright 2005 ASCII Corp.([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > based on dvips(k) 5.95a Copyright 2005 Radical Eye Software > (www.radicaleye.com) > ' TeX output 2007.03.19:1507' -> mydoc.ps > <tex.pro><texps.pro>. <cmr10.pfb>[1] > $ > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > > I seem to have the same dvips as yours: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > $ /usr/bin/dvips.nonja mydoc.dvi -o mydoc.ps > This is dvips(k) 5.95a Copyright 2005 Radical Eye Software > (www.radicaleye.com) > ' TeX output 2007.03.19:1507' -> mydoc.ps > <tex.pro><texps.pro>. <cmr10.pfb>[1] > $ > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > > My dvips seems to be from the dvipsk-ja package, > while the other one is from the tetex-bin package.
I tried with dvipsk-ja installed here and I cannot replicate the bug. I am just curious: in the examples above, are you using the same mydoc.tex you reported before? Why is not "<tipa10.pfb>" getting included in the PS file? -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
