Sorry for taking time to reply. About a "not reproducible after a recompile" note in [1]:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 09:10:03AM +0100, Kaare Hviid wrote:
> Do you know *who* applied that "not reproducible" note? The latest
> binary available, 2.2.3.dfsg.1-1, produces the bug on amd64 (as well as
> 2.2.3-4 on Ubuntu dapper). I've tried recompiling with gcc-3.3, gcc-3.4
> as well as the current gcc-4.1, to no avail - the bug is real. My test
I also seem to still have the bug after recompilation. Interesting.
> If you have a better test case, I'd be happy to hear about it. Also,
> could you by any chance test my patch (posted on BTS) and verify that
> it solves your problem, and isn't just a thing on my side?
Seems to fix the problem for me too.
Sami
[1] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/secure-testing/data/CVE/list?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
