amaury darsch wrote: > Hello Paul, > > I looked into the patch and it looks to me like a hack. I would rather prefer > to add a new platform that corresponds to kFreeBsd. This will be a one hour > work but I cannot test it. The release 1.5.0 might come by mid April. I could > add this new platform but somebody will have to test it. Eventually I could > give you an early access to the 1.5.0 release in case you might want to test > it. Let me know how to proceed. Also I noticed that the person who reported > the bug is French. Do you mind if I contact him directly to do the testing in > case you cannot do it. > > Again, adding a new platform is quite simple and I rather prefer we do it > right at the beginning. > > cordially > amaury
Hello amaury and Cyril, Thanks for your reply. I believe Cyril was aiming for "minimum changes" in his patch, rather than the most elegant solution. That way we could be sure it wouldn't affect any other architectures (Cyril, please correct me if I am wrong). I'd be happy for you to talk to Cyril directly - are you happy to do that Cyril? If you'd prefer not to, just let me know and I'll upload the new version of AFNIX as normal. Cyril, do you have access to a GNU/kFreeBSD machine, or were you just monitoring the buildd log? I'm wondering how best to test it - would it just be easiest if I uploaded the new version to "experimental"? Thanks, Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
