* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-30 16:45]: > * Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-30 16:23]: > > > If that file is really non-free, you should probably repackage the > > tarball (I note the tarball was repackaged anyway, as it has 'rafael' as > > owner of all files) removing that file. If it's merely not allowed to > > link it in GPL programs, you can of course leave it where it is, as you > > do not link it in (I did not verify that, but take your word for it). > > The license of the problematic file (praat-4.3/ipa/ipaSerifRegularPS.c) > does allow its use and distribution freely (only modification is > forbidden), so I do not see a strong reason for not having it in the > tarball. This file is not used at all to generated the praat binary (I > used xipaPS.c instead), so the binary package is fully DFSG-compliant. > > Please tell me exactly what I should do to clear the situation up. I > really wish to have praat in unstable.
I uploaded a new version of the package (4.3.04-1). The problematic file is not more in the upstream tarball (the upstream author has integrated my GPLed file). The package is now fully DFSG-compliant, both the source and the binary. Could you please move it into sid? Thanks, -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]