Holger Levsen wrote: > from the package descriptions, feta and wajig seem to have the same features. > Joe Wreschnig, the orphaning maintainer of feta is also it's upstream, so I > wonder what reasons there are to keep feta in the archive? > > Wouldn't removing it and adding a "conflicts: & provides: feta" (or > "replaces"? it's too early on a sunday...) to wajig a sensible road to take? > Or am I missing something?
It's still very useful, but I don't have the time to maintain it myself. Unless it becomes unusable for some reason I'd like to see it kept. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]