* John W. Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-10 15:18]: > I think this is unfortunate since Octave is useful on its own without > Octave Forge and I think 2.9.10 is much better than 2.9.9.
A not-so-unrelated question: currently, the virtual package called "octave" in Debian depends on octave2.1. Should we change it to octave2.9? -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
