tags 418993 moreinfo tags 418994 moreinfo tags 418995 moreinfo thanks Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: preining > Date: 2007-04-13 08:51:07 +0000 (Fri, 13 Apr 2007) > New Revision: 2684 > > Modified: > texlive-new/trunk/all/debian/tpm2deb.cfg > texlive-new/trunk/texlive-base/debian/changelog > texlive-new/trunk/texlive-bin/debian/changelog > texlive-new/trunk/texlive-lang/debian/changelog > Log: > add various replaces, closes: 418993 418994 418995 I don't think this is the correct solution. We already have conflicts;texlive-common;tetex-bin (<< 2007), tetex-base (<< 2007), tetex-extra (<< 2007), tetex-doc (<< 2007) Furthermore, in all of Rene's reports there is something like Versions of packages texlive-font-utils depends on: ii libc6 2.5-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries pn texlive-base <none> (no description available) pn texlive-common <none> (no description available) On a normal install, apt-get or aptitude will first install tl-common before trying any of the packages Rene reported about, and this will remove tetex-bin except for the empty transitional package. By the way I've tried this long ago... So either something else is going wrong, or Rene used some --force-foo Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)