Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>   OK, I just did a quick test and it looks like the unused removals are
> separated from the other removals.

Good - I didn't have the window open any more.

>   The list is confusing overall, with stuff being listed multiple times
> in different places.  Maybe all three lists (of auto, unused, and manual
> removals) should be placed right next to the prompt for better
> visibility?  I think removals are placed near the top so they'll be more
> obvious, but this has the opposite effect if the terminal is too small.

Whether top or bottom I do not care, but you are right that the
different categories are confusing.  I always thought that there's
"REMOVED because ..." on the one hand and "REMOVED ..." as the union of
the "REMOVED because" lists.  Usually this occurs with "aptitude remove
foo", and I'm being told that this will automatically also remove bar
and libbar1, and totally "foo bar libbar1" will be REMOVED.

But a REMOVED list that doesn't cover everything is not useful.  Either
it's dropped completely, or it's updated to really cover the complete
union of all of them.

I would prefer the latter:  When there's a larger dist-upgrade, this is
often the only section that I closely inspect.  I expect if something
really unwanted is going on, it will show up there.

Regards, Frank
-- 
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)

Reply via email to