On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 11:05:26AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 10:40:43AM +0200, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail > wrote: > > tags 419498 + confirmed > > thanks > > > > Thanks Mike ... > > > > any upstream bug id for "system-hunspell" ? Last time I looked there > > has been just a patch upgrading in-source myspell to hunspell, but not > > the system one. > > Seeing the comments in bz#345080 which is about system myspell, I felt no > need to send the system hunspell patch... > > I'm also hoping they will use a generic contract ID for the spellchecker > implementation, which is also why I'm not changing the contract ID for > hunspell, as the patch in bugzilla does, see my comments on bz#319778. >
welcome home ... :) this makes (nearly) no sense ... well, as long as hunspell/myspell does not ship shared libs one can still argue that it really doesn't matter as we have to respin gecko(s) in case a security issue in myspell/hunspell pops up ... Of course, thats not the way they argue ... if you want to call their comments "to argue" at all. Anyway, any news on shared-libs for hunspell? How does OOo project think about this? - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
