On Mit, 18 Apr 2007, Florent Rougon wrote:
> > Yes they do: texlive-extra-utils/2007 depends on
> > texlive-common/2007 conflicts with
> > texlive-pdfetex
>
> That is not enough. With these depends and conflicts, apt could unpack
> texlive-extra-utils/2007 while texlive-pdfetex is unpacked (because they
> don't conflict), which I suppose would fail (because I suppose that
> epstopdf is shipped in the same path in both packages).
>
> The dependency you cited only ensures that texlive-extra-utils/2007 will
> be *configured* after texlive-common/2007 is configured. Nothing about
> unpacking, which is where file conflicts usually happen.
Hmm. What about asking removal of texlive-pdfetex? Would be the cleanest
solution ;-)
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Università di Siena
Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QUENBY (n.)
A stubborn spot on a window which you spend twenty minutes trying to
clean off before discovering it's on the other side of the glass.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
