On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:32:49AM +0200, Xavier Hienne wrote: > Nathan Scott a écrit : > > Let's reassign this bug to glibc, and ask those folks to take > > a look at the problem. > > Maybe should this bug be untagged "upstream" then ?
Since its working on other versions of glibc (ie SLES9), odds are its an upstream bug anyway (maybe not, but probably). At this stage, I think we should leave it for the glibc guys to determine. cheers. -- Nathan
