On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 09:56:11AM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 17:50 +1000, Anand Kumria wrote: > > What kind of 'double address assignments' are you seeing? > > # ip addr show ethp_0 > 8: ethp_0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:80:c7:ee:88:d6 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 192.168.1.8/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope link ethp_0 > inet 169.254.126.94/16 scope link ethp_0 > > > Try addresses assigned to the same interface. > > This results from the fact that the if-up.d hook script runs zeroconf > after ifup has configured the interface.
This is expected behaviour:
clam:[~]% ip addr show eth0
4: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
link/ether 00:02:b3:98:e8:a4 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 169.254.246.157/16 scope link eth0
inet 192.168.12.250/24 brd 192.168.12.255 scope global eth0
inet6 3ffe:8002:1002:12:202:b3ff:fe98:e8a4/64 scope global dynamic
valid_lft 2591858sec preferred_lft 604658sec
inet6 fe80::202:b3ff:fe98:e8a4/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 3ffe:8002:1002:12:6159:eec:cd13:609c/64 scope global secondary dynamic
valid_lft 604299sec preferred_lft 85299sec
Cheers,
Anand
--
`When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to
its subjects, "This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are
forbidden to know," the end result is tyranny and oppression no matter how
holy the motives' -- Robert A Heinlein, "If this goes on --"
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
