On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 06:25:13PM -0700, David Lawyer wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 12:21:01PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote: > > I wonder if we can get rid of the way the -f option is currently > > implemented. Passing "-P-cbou" if -f is enabled and "-P-c" otherwise, both > > in case nothing is explicitely passed from the command line, should have > > a similar effect. > > I had the same thought. I hope that the -bou covers all cases of > overstiking. I think it does but ...
According to grotty man, if '-c' is enabled '-o' should supress all overstriking other than that disabled by '-b' or '-u', so seems it should work. I have just uploaded a new version, to test that in real life. Old un-overstriking code is removed, things are made a bit more compact and some cosmetic changes are also included. -- Agustin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
