Hi Simon, Thanks for the report. We'll upload a new version soon without this problem.
Thanks, Hugo On 5/9/07, Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Severity: serious Package: mrd6 Version: 0.9.5-rev3-0.1 User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: nonfree-doc rfc Hi! This source package contains the following files from the IETF under non-free license terms: +pkg mrd6 ver 0.9.5-rev3-0.1 + mrd6-0.9.5-rev3/src/docs/rfcs/rfc2858.txt + mrd6-0.9.5-rev3/src/docs/rfcs/rfc3569.txt + mrd6-0.9.5-rev3/src/docs/rfcs/rfc3956.txt + mrd6-0.9.5-rev3/src/docs/rfcs/rfc2710.txt + mrd6-0.9.5-rev3/src/docs/rfcs/rfc3810.txt + mrd6-0.9.5-rev3/src/docs/rfcs/draft-ietf-ssm-arch-06.txt + mrd6-0.9.5-rev3/src/docs/rfcs/rfc2362.txt + mrd6-0.9.5-rev3/src/docs/rfcs/rfc1771.txt + mrd6-0.9.5-rev3/src/docs/rfcs/rfc2464.txt + mrd6-0.9.5-rev3/src/docs/rfcs/draft-ietf-pim-sm-v2-new-11.txt The license on RFC/I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see: * http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 * http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation * http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments The etch release policy says binary and source packages must each be free: * http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy: * http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg There are (at least) three ways to fix this problem. In order of preference: 1. Ask the author of the RFC to re-license the RFC under a free license. A template for this e-mail request can be found at http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments 2. Remove the non-free material from the source, e.g., by re-packaging the upstream archive and adding 'dfsg' to the Debian package version name. 3. Move the package to non-free. General discussions are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages". Thanks, Simon
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
