* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > severity 299486 important > thanks > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 07:08:51PM +0200, Florian Boelstler wrote: > > Steve Langasek wrote: > > >>I was referring to the initial bug report: > > >>"Whenever I try to write anything in the address bar or google search bar > > >>the Firefox chases (I uninstalled all extensions and wiped out all > > >>configuration files)" > > > >>In my situation Firefox freezes and sometimes renders KDE unusable. > > > >... which is clearly *not* the symptom being reported in the original > > >report. A lockup may be due to this same bug, or an unrelated bug, or a > > >bug > > >in your window manager. > > > OK, sorry for providing incorrect information in the first place. > > Since the original report mentioned "just typing a few characters into > > the location/google bar and freeze" seemed somehow related to my > > problem. Whatever,... > > He said crash, not freeze. (Well, he said "chase", but "crash" was clearly > meant.) > > > (gdb) run > > Starting program: /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/firefox-bin -a firefox -P default > > > After typing a few characters into the location/google bar Firefox freezes. > > > Forgot to mention that I use the SwitchProxy extension. > > "~/.firefox/plugins" contains: flashplayer.xpt, libflashplayer.so > > > Removed XUL.mfasl once between restarts of Firefox. > > > I didn't get to make my window manager unusable again. > > Ok, so it sounds like this was an unrelated extension problem. > > The original crash reported has so far only been reproduced on systems > running 2.6.11, which is not a release kernel. I'm therefore downgrading > this bug; unless someone (preferably the original reporter, so that we know > we're talking about the same bug!) can show a backtrace running on a kernel > that's targetted for sarge release, I recommend closing the report.
It also seems that everyone was running a testing system and not unstable, so perhaps it is some older library version bug that we're seeing. I'm not certain about that correlation, but that was the impression I got from looking at the reports. Is anyone not running testing and seeing this? -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
