On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 04:28:13PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> 
> Um, no, they are not.  I don't need to "dig into the source" to know you're
> wrong.  Check the PAM spec, the API documentation in the pam-doc package, or
> the symbol table of any Debian version of libpam.so.0 -- if these symbols
> are missing, your build is very badly broken.

You are right, sorry, reviewing it again I've found that the code is 
indeed in the library (actually in pam_item.c). I will try to check what's 
wrong here...

Javier

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to