also sprach Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.20.0110 +0200]: > Have you looked at what would break if this test was removed? I'm > not convinced that its unnecessary, and removing it will only > solve problems and not create new ones. However, if you've > determined that this is so, I'd certainly love to hear that.
Well, when the server side rdiff does not match the local version, it bitches: piper:~> rdiff-backup --include /etc --exclude '/*' / [EMAIL PROTECTED]::/srv/backups/piper Warning: Local version 1.1.9 does not match remote version 1.1.5. it then works. My assumption is simply that since rdiff-backup itself does a version comparison and should know better which versions are compatible with each other, adding a 1:1 requirement to backupninja may be more limiting than necessary. In this very instance, it disables me from tightening the password-less login for the backup user via authorized_keys. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
