On Tuesday 29 May 2007 17:08, Marc Sherman wrote:
> Have you decided if you want to do this? The thread on
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] seemed mostly for the idea, and there was
> subsequently another thread on the same list about the related package
> dkim-milter that seemed to agree with that assessment.

I'm rather indifferent to libmail-dkim-perl being added to volatile. However, 
I don't feel very much like going through the changes from the version in 
etch and picking out some minimum set instead of simply putting in a recent 
upstream version. Furthermore, the DKIM RFC is finished now, so there 
probably won't be much need for more than one upload to volatile (or 
volatile-sloppy).

-- 
Magnus Holmgren   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Attachment: pgpnwSS01YEyr.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to