On 6/3/07, Cameron Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/3/07, Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't use the latex output much either. I'm certainly open to > listing texlive-latex-extra rather than just texlive-latex-base, as > long as I can understand why it would be required. I'll do some more > testing and see what I can come up with.From epydoc/latex.py (line 63): > \usepackage{makeidx, multirow, longtable, tocbibind, amssymb} I assume that will fail if the packages are unavailable. Again, I haven't tried it, but I assume you're testing will find an error there.
Aargh! I see it now. Sorry, that was stupidity on my part. I definitely need texlive-latex-extra, but it's worse than that. The new texlive infrastructure isn't quite a true superset of tetex, so I also had to patch latex.py to remove references to the fancyheader package, which isn't available in texlive at all. After these changes, things seem to work fine, and I'll upload a new package shortly. KEN -- Kenneth J. Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cedar-solutions.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
