Bdale Garbee writes ("Bug#341839: Call for vote: coreutils: md5sum output format"): > As Anthony noted in his early March summary of open issues, the current > md5sum behavior matches the formats used by upstream, and by related tools > such as sha1sum, sha256sum, and sha512sum. He suggested that we should > rescind the previous TC decision in favor of existing practice, which means > ranking choice 2 on this ballot first.
Obviously my view is that sha*sum should have the behaviour specified in the previous resolution. > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > [ 1 ] Choice 1: the output of md5sum should be changed as per bug #341839 > [ 3 ] Choice 2: the output of md5sum should not change despite bug #341839 > [ 2 ] Choice 3: Further discussion > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]