On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 08:49:36PM +1000, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> Less anger :-)
>  
> fwiw, I'm inclined to agree with you, changing the xterm's title is somewhat
> obnoxious, and from my research, there appears to be no way to retrieve the
> current title, so there's no way to restore it after changing.

here are two:

1. use XGetWindowProperty (used by vim, I hate it)
2. use the OSC sequence to retrieve it (works with e.g. urxvt in
   insecure mode, but some terminals disable it).

> Dag, I think you need to consider your users some more.

Bad argument. Dag might or might not heed it, but in general, he as the
author is free to do whatever he pleases (you did not imply otherwise). I
do not think free software authors have any obligation to consider their
users (they work for free, after all), and if they want to listen to their
users, its a feature and extraordinarily nice :)

> The current title
> you set doesn't really buy the user a lot, so I think given we've got at
> least one user who's rather passionately against it (and it's bitten me more
> than once before as well), I think I'll patch it out of the Debian package.

Wohooo! Great news, so many thanks :)

-- 
                The choice of a
      -----==-     _GNU_
      ----==-- _       generation     Marc Lehmann
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /      http://schmorp.de/
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\      XX11-RIPE


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to