Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 18:11 schrieb Marcos Marado: > On Tuesday 19 June 2007 16:55, Rainer Dorsch wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 15:00 schrieben Sie: > > > Are the Etch packages built from the -1 or -2 version of 1.17? The main > > > change was using the default g++ instead of the g++-3.4 specified by > > > upstream. > > > > -1 > > Can you please package -2 to see if the problem still happens?
Sure, I can. But as I understood Paul, this is even further away from the upstream compile (Ubuntu packages), because they recommend the gcc-3.4. > > > As I understand it, the cafuego packages appear to just be the upstream > > > binary releases extracted to /opt and then put into a .deb, so they're > > > built with the non-free libraries, which might make a difference. > > > > > > (Specifically, it could be an openJPEG problem... I also uploaded > > > openJPEG 1.2 which produces libopenjpeg2, you may not have noticed...) > > > > I updated the openjpeg packages, I do not know though if Marcos picked > > them. > > Yes, I did. Hmmm.....try to summarize 1. The etch packages work for me not for you -> points to a problem specific to your machine 2. The ubuntu packages (which are the distributed binaries) work for you -> points to the Debian packages Paul, do you know if any of the dependencies allow several alternatives? E.g. if java is required Marco could run a sun JDK, I could run gcj or something like that. Marcos, could you try to run reportbug on slviewer to see the version of your installed dependencies? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07032-359190 jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/
