On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 07:39:23PM +0400, Paul Romanchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > Here we go! gdb stacktrace follows. > Aptitude was built from sources fetched by 'apt-get source aptitude'. > aptitude_0.4.5.3-1.diff.gz, aptitude_0.4.5.3-1.dsc, > aptitude_0.4.5.3.orig.tar.gz > > > Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. > [Switching to Thread -1212557616 (LWP 848)] > 0xffffe410 in ?? () > (gdb) bt > #0 0xffffe410 in ?? () > #1 0xbfc87e9c in ?? () > #2 0x00000006 in ?? () > #3 0xb7bce5b1 in abort () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 > #4 0xb7dd2530 in __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler () > from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > #5 0xb7dcfdd5 in std::set_unexpected () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > #6 0xb7dcfe12 in std::terminate () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > #7 0xb7dcff3a in __cxa_throw () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > #8 0xb7d66e5f in std::__throw_out_of_range () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > #9 0x0819a1ab in vs_editline::handle_key (this=0x8889558, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > at > basic_string.h:306
I still can't reproduce this, but I have a pretty good idea which codepath you're going down, and I see at least one potential bug on it. Could you try this patch and see if it helps any? Daniel
diff -r 9b9ecdfff423 src/vscreen/vs_editline.cc --- a/src/vscreen/vs_editline.cc Wed Jun 20 06:14:18 2007 -0700 +++ b/src/vscreen/vs_editline.cc Sun Jun 24 10:31:00 2007 -0700 @@ -369,7 +369,11 @@ bool vs_editline::handle_key(const key & else { if(clear_on_this_edit) - text.clear(); + { + text.clear(); + curloc = 0; + startloc = 0; + } text.insert(curloc++, 1, k.ch); normalize_cursor();