On 26/06/07 at 14:01 +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> * Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070626 13:56]:
> > On 26/06/07 at 00:29 +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I believe I've answered your email but I just looked at the bts and I 
> > > see no record for it so here goes another reply for the record.
> > > 
> > > You asked if I wanted to adopt websec for which I am upstream 
> > > maintainer. I will probably do that if no one else does, but I'd be 
> > > happier if someone else does the Debian packaging as I have little time 
> > > to work on websec and having someone else maintain the Debian packaging 
> > > and forwarding just the upstream bugs would be better for me.
> > > 
> > > Let me know if you are still interested in maintaining websec, if not 
> > > I'll go for the default option and adopt it myself so it won't 
> > > package-rot too much.
> > 
> > Hi Baruch,
> > 
> > My perl knowledge is very limited, so I don't feel confortable
> > maintaining it alone. However, if you want to share the load for the
> > packaging bugs, we could maintain it together on collab-maint.
> 
> OK. Works for me. I'm not a perl guru myself but I can handle myself
> with enough manpage reading.
> 
> I'd be happy to try git for for package maintenance but have no problem
> working with svn (or possibly another choice). Do you have any
> preference?

Ah, I don't know git either, but trying it sounds good to me.
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to