On Wednesday 27 June 2007 23:39, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's probably going overboard, but some application might
> even want to call fsync on each containing directory.

I expect that the overhead of calling fsync on the directory is negligible 
compared to the overhead of calling it on the files.  So it might be best to 
just have a single option.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to