On Thursday 28 June 2007, A Mennucc wrote: > hi > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 12:23:28AM +0200, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > > I was just curious why the fuzzyocr3 package is only in > > experiemental, and not uploaded to replace fuzzyocr in unstable? It > > seems ready to replace what's in unstable and testing? > > fuzzyocr3 depends on netpbm ; Debian contains only a reduced subset > of netpbm, due to licensing issues ; for this reason, the Debian > package is somewhat nonfunctional
Ah, OK! > I need to find some time to study fuzzyocr3 in depth and to > substitute all netpbm commands with other commands available in > Debian ... but this is not easy Yeah, imagineably. Have you taken the issue up with upstream? In my experience, ImageMagick is a pretty unstable heap of software, Imager, libimager-perl in Debian, is a whole lot better, if it would have the functions it needs. Cheers, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo Programmer / Astrophysicist / Ski-orienteer / Orienteer / Mountaineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/ OpenPGP KeyID: 6A6A0BBC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
