Do you mean having the right audacious-plugins dependency on audacious wouldn't be enough ?
Adeodato Simó a écrit : > * Steve Langasek [Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:25:11 -0700]: > >> But at a minimum, yes, the audacious-plugins package should be depending on >> libaudacious by way of shlibdeps. > > There is no NEEDED entry in the plugins against libaudaciousX. Do you > mean hardcoding the dependency instead? (Which, true, solves the > situation.) > > Cheers, >
